AI Safety3 mins read

Sam Altman Reportedly Outlined Three Possible Endgames for AI Safety

A reported internal OpenAI presentation described three paths for governing advanced AI: an IAEA-style watchdog, a CERN-like consortium of major labs, or one dominant firm controlling compute. Altman reportedly called the last option “terrible.”

The Core Choice: Global Rules, Shared Control, or Compute Power

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reportedly laid out three internal scenarios for governing advanced AI. The options range from an international watchdog modeled after the International Atomic Energy Agency, to a merged or umbrella structure for major AI labs, to a single company becoming powerful enough to restrict everyone else’s compute. The third path was reportedly included for completeness, and Altman called it “terrible.”

The Watchdog Model Would Put Audits and Compute Monitoring First

The first approach would create an institution modeled after the IAEA to enforce safety standards. According to the article, such a body could inspect systems, require audits, and monitor compute and energy use. The main challenge is coordination: this model would depend on international cooperation, including with countries building frontier models.

The Consortium Model Would Consolidate Major AI Labs

Altman reportedly called the second approach the “Demis Plan,” tied to a proposal from Demis Hassabis for an AI organization modeled after CERN. In Altman’s version, major labs would merge into a single entity or operate under its umbrella. That entity would then supply cooperating countries with models, making governance more centralized but also raising major competition and control questions.

The Compute-Dominance Scenario Highlights the Stakes

The third approach, reportedly called the “Eliezer Plan,” imagines one AI developer gaining so much economic power through self-improving AI that it could withhold compute from others or shut down competing computing capabilities. The article says Altman raised the scenario only for completeness. Its inclusion underscores how central compute access has become in debates over AI safety, competition, and control.

OpenAI Faces a Timing Problem

Altman reportedly said there are too few viable proposals for a “speed limit” on AI development, while OpenAI also cannot afford to fall behind rivals. The article says OpenAI plans to choose a path within the next year. That decision comes as pressure builds around model safeguards, voluntary U.S. pre-approval reviews, and disagreements among major AI companies over frontier AI standards.

Discover More

    A major security flaw found using an OpenAI model is causing internet chaos
    OpenAI PHP Flaw

    A reported PHP vulnerability found with an OpenAI model has set off urgent cybersecurity action.

    OpenAICybersecurity
    OpenAI acquires Orchestra Bio to build AI agents that speed up drug development
    OpenAI buys Orchestra Bio

    OpenAI plans to merge Orchestra Bio with Rosalind to build AI agents for pharmaceutical R&D workflows.

    OpenAIAI in medicine
    Collage symbolizing communication chaos from AI agents sending emails, legal threats, and confidential data while trying to force a train ticket refund.
    AI agents flood refund test

    Six AI agents failed to win a refund while exposing risks around privacy, honesty, and message overload.

    AI agentsAI safety
    Anthropic Claude image accompanying The Decoder article
    Anthropic’s AI Agent Deal Rules

    Anthropic is working with law firms on fair negotiation norms for AI agents and hiring experts to improve Claude in low-data fields.

    AnthropicClaude